![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Google image search and "&"? For some unknown reason, I tried to do a google image search for "&&&&&&&", and it returns seemingly random results. I tried variations on the number of &'s, and they all seem to return different things, even up into 20 or 30 &'s in a row. Anyone have any idea what's up with that?
sir_flexalot
haven't you got more important things to do?
muppet
"haven't you got more important things to do?"
apparently my anonymous friend is unfamiliar with sarcasm.
muppet
Unsurprizingly it means that exact string was on the page the image was found on.
Just me (Sir to you)
Kids, don't MAKE me turn this forum around... I'll do it, just watch me!
Dad
I also get varing results depending wether I typed in "sports cars", "Britney Spears", or "ice scating". I can't figger out why though!
Gary van der Merwe
Juist me has found the answer.
Stephen Jones
Woops, here's the link
Stephen Jones
better answer:
Kenny
What's random about that? Those are pages with ampersands in them.
www.MarkTAW.com
If you scat whilst icing you have greater problems than just using Google.
Simon Lucy
You'd have to be a pretty brave fellow to type "scating" into Google.
(Required) Email LEets people email you through our web site; your address is never revealed
Yes - I know I can't spell.
Gary van der Merwe
That is not random. That search is meaningful. The web page contains Ampersnads of course. Go to the HTML source and search there. &&&'s will be there!
T. Hussain
|