If there is such a thing as a priority list at Fog Creek I would suggest that the Normal View/html View issue got priority over everything else (including new fancy features). It is simply too poor that such a basic function doesn't work. I now see that Joel and Co didn't intend designers to use Normal View at all, but use Dreamweaver instead. Well, that's new to me. And why then going through the trouble of implementing a close-to-useless image editor when we are better of using a real editor like PhotoShop? It's hard to spot the logic here. One could get the idea that the development of CityDesk didn't follow a strict plan, but rather depended of the here and now needs at Fog Creek itself. This probably isn't true, but it certainly looks like it.
What are you on about, you sexy fruit?
I guess that's not a nice comment from the anonymous Confused peson.
actually, the unicode support is excellent.
I agree, the Unicode support is excellent. No doubt about it. But the fact that unicode is a forced choice in not good imho.
You neglect to say why.
good that someone on this list (Lasse) is working on an external solution. http://discuss.fogcreek.com/citydesk/default.asp?cmd=show&ixPost=9332&ixReplies=5
Adriaan van den Brand
Fog Creek Home