Fog Creek Software
Discussion Board




RDFS

I'm reading Resource Description Framework
(RDF) Schema Specification 1.0 from the  http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/
and i don´t  understand one thing in graph Figure 2: Class Hierarchy for the RDF Schema is the rdfs:resource subClass of the Rdfs:Class or is the Rdfs:Class subClass of the rdfs:resource. Can someone explain this.

Elmo
Saturday, June 05, 2004

RDFS?

RTFM!!

Da Car Guys
Saturday, June 05, 2004

ROFL!!

My Cousin Vinniwashtharam
Saturday, June 05, 2004

Really? On the floor?

anon-y-mous cow-ard
Saturday, June 05, 2004

I think W3C left Planet Earth quite a few years ago. Check out Joel's old article on Architecture Astronauts:  http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html

By the way does anyone else think W3C is like Clive Sinclair? Sinclair had some big hits with his low cost home computers in the UK back in the early 80s. His machines we mostly used for games but Clive never really understood this and threw all his money into low end business machines like the Sinclair QL. I get the feeling that W3C doesn't really understand the web anymore and has gone off on the machine processing tangent.

Matthew Lock
Sunday, June 06, 2004

Ummm, The C5.

I'm not sure if that was an example of astrotecture (go I wish I'd coined that word), or just plain foolishness.

Simon Lucy
Sunday, June 06, 2004

Hey anyone remember the old computer game on the Spectrum "C5 Clive"?

Matthew Lock
Sunday, June 06, 2004

I can read myself that rdfs:class is a subclass of rdfs:resource, and the rdfs:resource is the type of rdfs:class
but in the spets they say that  RDFS:Cass cant  be the subclass

Elmo
Sunday, June 06, 2004

*  Recent Topics

*  Fog Creek Home