I have been HTMLing for a week now and I like to do most of it in HTML view. However, I'm not confident enough to avoid peeking now and again.
HTML mode is now a misnomer. XHTML or source mode might be better? In CityDesk 1.0, HTML mode showed the HTML source code. CityDesk 2.0 wants valid XHTML (XML-like HTML, or something).
Thanks, much appreciated!
BTW: You can learn more about XHTML here: http://www.w3.org/.
An older discussion:
Thanks again guys! Saved me considerable effort.
… and the above once again made me wish that Fog Creek would publish a known bugs list – although I know that they will not. Sad, sad. It would save newcomers so much trouble and frustration.
I dunno if this helps anyone, but I found http://www.w3schools.org really useful for all my (X)HTML and CSS learning
Go figure... It leaves the valid htm... er XHTML alone. This thing is definitely growing on me.
Fog Creek Home